Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Implication of PTSD in Pittsburgh Personal Injury Suits

Pittsburgh personal injury lawsuits are increasingly including claims for mental injuries specifically Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Post-traumatic stress disorder is a type of anxiety disorder. It can occur after you've seen or experienced a traumatic event that involved the threat of injury or death. Symptoms of PTSD fall into three main categories: 1. "Reliving" the event, which disturbs day-to-day activity; 2. Avoidance; and 3. Arousal (easily startled, hypervigilant). Pittsburgh injury lawsuits are seeing this condition more frequently because of PTSD’s inclusion in the DSM-IV, legitimizing the condition as well as its built in establishment of legal causation i.e. the stress is always linked to a specific causal event.

Deirdre Smith (Maine) has a recent article that just came out in the Temple Law Review, "Diagnosing Liability: The Legal History of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder." While the whole article is fascinating the implications of PTSD on tort law, starting on page 41 was the most interesting to me. Smith’s following points particularly jumped out:

1.  A psychiatrist observed that, by virtue of the A Criterion, “an external injury is by definition the explicit cause of this disorder,” which then operates to support “legal arguments regarding single and proximate causation of harm.”

2.  The American Psychiatric Association’s recognition of PTSD led to many courts abolishing the prior requirement of “physical manifestation” as a prerequisite for claim of psychic injuries. Instead, injury lawsuits wherein PTSD is the primary claim of injury now, typically, only require expert medical or scientific proof to support the claim.

3.  Malingering (symptom exaggeration), a favorite tool of defense attorneys to limit a plaintiff’s damages, has, because of PTSD’s ties to litigation, become a part of the DSM-IV diagnostic language, specifically stating “Malingering should be ruled out in those situations in which financial remuneration, benefit eligibility, and forensic determinations play a role.”

This last bit about malingering should leave plaintiff’s attorneys handling potential PTSD claims wary of the extent to which they get involved with a given therapist or psychiatric professional treating the client. Because it is clear that once the psych doctor is made aware that the mental injury may relate to a lawsuit, they will be more likely to add language to the treatment notes speculating about malingering. This, of course, is a case killer.

-- Share this post :
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on StumbleUpon
Share on Delicious
Share on Reddit
Share on Digg
Share on simpy
Share on Technorati
furl Share on furl
Feeds RSS Subscribe to Feeds RSS

1 comment:

  1. Hello. What I seek seems hard to find a lawyer who specializes in PTSD stemming from abuse, torment , unfathomable harassment . false allegations etc
    That have been both recent and long term

    ReplyDelete